Summary Paragraph Beginning on April 30, 2010, severe storms, tornadoes, heavy rains, high winds, flooding, and flash flooding affected the City of Clarksville, TN. The Applicant’s Facility sustained damage to its motors, pumps, Motor Control Center (MCC) switchgear and other components of the electrical infrastructure. FEMA prepared Project Worksheet (PW) 5599 to address damage to the Facility. In its first appeal, the Applicant requested that FEMA (1) increase the Cost Estimating Format (CEF) to account for electrical contractor services; (2) approve code upgrades for the magnetic flow meter, heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) system, combustible gas detectors and stairs and walkways in accordance with National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 820, the 2003 version of the International Building Code (IBC), and Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC) Design Criteria; (3) approve a Hazard Mitigation Proposal (HMP) elevating the powerhouse above the May 2010 flood event and build an accompanying new powerhouse to support the elevated switchgear; (4) approve a HMP for new submersible pumps and; (5) address miscellaneous issues. The Region IV Regional Administrator (RA) partially approved the appeal for an additional $345,121.78 for electrical contractor services, mechanical and electrical contract work, and HMP costs for two submersible pumps. However, the RA denied the first appeal regarding the work associated with code compliance requirements (Item 2) and HMP to elevate the powerhouse above the existing lift station (Item 3). The Applicant’s second appeal asserts that FEMA incorrectly classified the project to elevate the powerhouse as hazard mitigation. The Applicant contends that this project, like the other code compliance requests, is mandated by TDEC requirements. Authorities and Second Appeals Stafford Act § 406. 44 C.F.R. § 206.226(d). DAP 9527.4, Construction Codes and Standards. FEMA Second Appeal Analysis, City of Gulfport, FEMA-1604-DR-MS, at 3. Headnotes Pursuant to 44 C.F.R. § 206.226(d), FEMA may reimburse costs of federal, state, and local repair or replacement codes or standards, if the codes or standards (1) apply to the type of repair or restoration required; (2) are appropriate to the predisaster use of the facility; (3) are found reasonable, in writing, and formally adopted and implemented by the state or local government on or before the disaster declaration date or are a federal requirement applicable to the type of restoration; (4) apply uniformly to all similar types of facilities within the jurisdiction of owner of the facility and; (5) were enforced during the time standards were in effect. All five prongs must be met in order to be eligible for PA funding. The TDEC Design Criteria do not meet the “formally adopted” or “uniformly applied” prongs of 44 C.F.R. § 206.226(d). As such, the upgrades completed in accordance with them are not eligible for PA reimbursement.