Independent FEMA Public Assistance resource. Not affiliated with FEMA.Start hereReform trackerContact
Get technical assistance
Home / Laws & Policy / PAPPG Explorer / Chapter 10
PAPPG v5.0 · Chapter 10 · pages 234–245

Environmental and Historic Preservation

Every PA project gets an environmental and historic preservation (EHP) review. This chapter covers what EHP needs from you, which projects get a quick review and which take longer, the rules for emergency work, debris and permanent repairs, the main laws (NEPA, Section 106, the Endangered Species Act, floodplain and wetland orders, coastal barriers and the Clean Water Act), and how to get through review faster. Every section is written as the question applicants actually ask, with FEMA’s requirements, the records you need, and the exact PAPPG pages.

9 topicsEvery project gets an EHP reviewGet permits before you build45+ year-old buildings: longer review
Jump to a part of the chapter
Chapter 10 › I.F–H Coordination with Other Federal Agencies; Partnerships and Resources

What happens when other federal agencies are involved, and where do museums and libraries get help?

Coordination with other federal agencies; Unified Federal Review; Heritage Emergency National Task Force
pp. 244–245
Short answer
When another federal agency is also funding, supporting or permitting work in the same area, FEMA coordinates early so you don’t face conflicting environmental standards. For example, FEMA works with HUD on public housing projects. The Unified Federal Review resolves disagreements between agencies, and the Heritage Emergency National Task Force helps museums, libraries and other cultural institutions.
What FEMA requires
  • When multiple federal agencies are conducting, funding or permitting projects in the same area, FEMA coordinates as early as possible to streamline EHP review and avoid conflicting standards.
  • Example: public housing agencies can receive PA funding; FEMA EHP coordinates with HUD on the environmental and historic review.
  • Unified Federal Review: offers more coordination between FEMA and other agencies and higher-level resolution when they reach an impasse.
  • Heritage Emergency National Task Force: a FEMA and Smithsonian partnership of 60-plus members that helps protect cultural and historic resources, supports private nonprofit cultural institutions such as museums, libraries and historical societies, advises on conservators, and evaluates scopes of work for treating objects.
Documentation

Information on other federal agencies funding, supporting or permitting work in the same area or on the same project, and for cultural institutions, details of collections and objects needing treatment.

Watch out · Govstar advice
Tell FEMA early about every other federal program touching the same site, such as HUD funding or a Corps permit. Late discovery of a second agency is a common cause of conflicting conditions and a stalled review.
PAPPG v5.0 pp. 244–245
Read this in the PAPPG
Chapter 10 › I.E.4–6 Floodplains and Wetlands; Coastal Barrier Resources Act; Clean Water Act

What rules apply to work in floodplains, wetlands, coastal barriers or waterways?

EO 11988 and 11990; Coastal Barrier Resources Act; Clean Water Act
pp. 242–244
Short answer
FEMA must run its 8-step decision process for work in or affecting a floodplain or wetland, including whether there is a practicable alternative location. Work in a coastal barrier unit must meet a legal exception. And you, not FEMA, are responsible for any Clean Water Act permits, such as a Section 404 permit for dredge or fill work like culvert and bridge replacements.
What FEMA requires
  • Floodplains and wetlands: PA projects must conform to 44 CFR Part 9. You review whether proposed actions are in a floodplain or wetland, and FEMA completes the 8-step process for those that are or may affect one. Document alternatives you considered. If the floodplain or wetland is the only practicable location, avoid or minimize impacts and meet any stricter federal, state or local standards (see Chapter 8).
  • Coastal Barrier Resources Act: projects in a CBRS unit are eligible only under a Section 6 exception and FEMA’s CBRA rules, with Fish and Wildlife consultation. Work in or next to an “otherwise protected area” does not require that consultation.
  • Clean Water Act: you must obtain Section 401 water quality certification and Section 402 NPDES permits whenever there is work in waterways or possible discharge of pollutants, including sediment. FEMA typically conditions approval on obtaining them.
  • Section 404: you must obtain a permit, declare a non-reporting nationwide permit, or document that none is required, for discharging dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, including wetlands. Common triggers: dredging or filling wetlands, culvert or bridge replacements, shoreline revetments, embankment armoring, dock and pier repairs, and beach renourishment.
<table class="pt-table"><thead><tr><th>Rule</th><th>What it means for your project</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>EO 11988 and EO 11990 (44 CFR Part 9)</td><td>FEMA completes the 8-step process for work in or affecting a floodplain or wetland, including looking at alternative locations</td></tr><tr><td>Coastal Barrier Resources Act</td><td>Work in a Coastal Barrier Resources System unit must meet a CBRA exception, with Fish and Wildlife consultation</td></tr><tr><td>Clean Water Act § 401 and § 402</td><td>You obtain water quality certification and discharge permits for work in waterways or with possible discharge, including sediment</td></tr><tr><td>Clean Water Act § 404</td><td>You obtain a permit, declare a non-reporting nationwide permit, or document no permit is needed for dredge or fill in waters, including wetlands</td></tr></tbody></table>
Documentation

Documentation of alternative locations and actions you considered for work in a floodplain or wetland; any Section 401 water quality certification, Section 402 NPDES permit, Section 404 permit, or notice of using a non-reporting nationwide permit; or documentation that no permit is required.

Watch out · Govstar advice
Culvert and bridge replacements, shoreline armoring, dock repairs and beach renourishment commonly trigger Section 404. FEMA typically makes permits a grant condition, so a missing Corps permit can cost you the funding for that work.
PAPPG v5.0 pp. 242–244 · 44 CFR Part 9 · EO 11988 · EO 11990 · CBRA · Clean Water Act §§ 401, 402, 404
Read this in the PAPPG
Chapter 10 › I.E.1–3 NEPA, NHPA and ESA

What do NEPA, Section 106 and the Endangered Species Act require for our project?

National Environmental Policy Act; National Historic Preservation Act; Endangered Species Act
pp. 241–242
Short answer
NEPA decides the level of environmental review, from an exclusion up to a full environmental impact statement. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act requires FEMA to check effects on historic properties and consult the State or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer. Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act requires review of effects on listed species and habitat, and consultation if there are effects.
What FEMA requires
  • NEPA: FEMA must consider effects of proposed actions and alternatives on the human environment before deciding. An environmental assessment ends in a finding of no significant impact, or a notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
  • NHPA Section 106: FEMA assesses whether PA work affects historic properties (buildings, structures, sites including archaeology, objects and districts) and consults the SHPO or THPO and other parties, including you, to resolve adverse effects. Programmatic agreements streamline this.
  • ESA Section 7: FEMA reviews PA projects for effects on listed species and critical habitat and consults the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or National Marine Fisheries Service if there may be an effect. Consultation may add project conditions you must follow.
  • Other laws may apply depending on location and work, including the Coastal Zone Management Act, RCRA and the Marine Mammal Protection Act (see Appendix D).
<table class="pt-table"><thead><tr><th>NEPA review level</th><th>When it applies</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Statutory exclusion (STATEX)</td><td>Work required after a disaster to return facilities to pre-disaster condition; exempt from NEPA</td></tr><tr><td>Categorical exclusion (CATEX)</td><td>Types of work that normally have no significant effect, with no extraordinary circumstances</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental assessment (EA)</td><td>Work not covered by a STATEX or CATEX where significant impacts are unlikely or unknown; includes alternatives and public involvement</td></tr><tr><td>Environmental impact statement (EIS)</td><td>Major actions that significantly affect the environment; extensive agency and public coordination</td></tr></tbody></table>
Documentation

Information on historic properties (age, renovations, listings) for Section 106 consultation; any species or habitat information for ESA review; and records showing you followed project conditions such as timing restrictions or construction practices.

Watch out · Govstar advice
Consultations under Section 106 and Section 7 can add conditions such as work windows that avoid nesting or spawning seasons. Build those into your construction schedule early, because missing one can make the work noncompliant.
PAPPG v5.0 pp. 241–242 · NEPA · NHPA § 106 · ESA § 7 · Appendix D
Read this in the PAPPG
Chapter 10 › I.D Navigating the EHP Compliance Process

How can we get through the EHP review faster?

Navigating the EHP compliance process
pp. 240–241
Short answer
Give EHP a complete, clear scope of work with maps, photos and site plans; get permits before construction; share any permits you already hold, which can speed the review; keep and attach all agency correspondence; and follow permit conditions and best management practices, then document that you did.
What FEMA requires
  • Provide a complete and clear scope of work to minimize clarification requests.
  • Provide maps or sketches, photos, site plans and descriptions of pre-disaster conditions and the proposed or completed work.
  • Obtain necessary permits and authorizations before construction.
  • Provide pre-existing permits and authorizations; FEMA may be able to expedite review based on them.
  • Keep copies of all correspondence with federal or state agencies about permits and attach them to the grant application.
  • Follow permit and authorization conditions and best management practices, and verify conditions were met if the work is complete.
Documentation

Maps, sketches, photos and site plans of pre-disaster conditions and the work; existing permits and authorizations; copies of all correspondence with federal and state agencies, attached to the grant application; and records showing permit conditions and best management practices were met.

Watch out · Govstar advice
Get permits before you build. Starting construction without required permits or authorizations puts the funding for that work at risk, and after-the-fact fixes are slow and uncertain.
PAPPG v5.0 pp. 240–241
Read this in the PAPPG
Chapter 10 › I.C.4 Permanent Work; Disposition of Original Facility

What EHP issues come up with permanent repairs, and what happens to the old facility in an alternate project?

EHP for permanent work; disposition of original facility
pp. 239–240
Short answer
Permanent work that changes a facility’s location, footprint, alignment or size, or affects natural or cultural resources, gets a deeper review, which is common for improved, alternate, relocation, code upgrade and mitigation projects. In alternate and alternative procedures projects, if you don’t repair or sell the old facility and it’s unsafe, you must secure it or demolish it, and coordinate with the historic and resource agencies.
What FEMA requires
  • Higher-risk permanent work examples: upsizing culverts, replacing or relocating a bridge, changes to historic buildings, rebuilding boardwalks or piers, relocating or burying utility lines, beach renourishment, relocating to undisturbed land, repairing substantially damaged structures in the floodplain, and new facilities.
  • Original facility: for alternate and alternative procedures projects, if you don’t repair, replace or sell the damaged facility and it is unsafe, you must make it safe and secure (restrict access, lock it, fence it) or demolish it.
  • Salvage proceeds reduce capped funding by the value of salvaged materials, less the cost to demolish, grade or secure.
  • If PA funds pay for work at the original site, FEMA reviews it for EHP. If not, you must coordinate with SHPO/THPO, Fish and Wildlife, NMFS or the Corps as needed, document it, and consider their recommended measures, at your own cost unless directly related to restoring disaster damage.
  • A facility kept for later use stays eligible in future incidents only if you repaired it to current codes, completed required mitigation and maintained the required insurance.
Documentation

For changes in size, location or alignment: design plans and any agency consultations. For alternate and alternative procedures projects that leave the original facility: documentation of coordination with SHPO/THPO, Fish and Wildlife, NMFS or the Corps of Engineers, and the agreed measures; or records showing the original facility was secured or demolished.

Watch out · Govstar advice
On alternate projects, the old site is still your responsibility. Coordination costs with historic or resource agencies there are generally yours unless directly tied to repairing disaster damage, and salvage income reduces the capped funding.
PAPPG v5.0 pp. 239–240
Read this in the PAPPG
Chapter 10 › I.C.1–3 Emergency Work, Debris Removal and Emergency Protective Measures

Does emergency work and debris removal need an environmental review?

EHP for emergency work (Categories A and B)
pp. 238–239
Short answer
Most emergency work is exempt from full NEPA review under Stafford Act Section 316, but other laws still apply, including the Endangered Species Act, the National Historic Preservation Act, solid waste and clean air and water laws, and the floodplain and invasive species executive orders. Debris must be staged at a safe distance from water, wetlands, wells and property lines, and you are responsible for the permits.
What FEMA requires
  • All emergency work: statutory exclusions exempt most emergency actions from NEPA review, but compliance with ESA, NHPA, RCRA, state solid waste laws, the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act and Executive Orders 11988 and 13112 is still required.
  • Debris removal: must avoid impacts to floodplains, wetlands, listed species and critical habitat, and historic properties (including underwater archaeology in waterways), and avoid hazardous gas release and water supply contamination. Stage debris at a safe distance from property lines, surface water, floodplains, wetlands, structures, wells and septic leach fields. Waterway debris, stump removal and fill may need more coordination. Staging sites may need remediation afterward.
  • Emergency protective measures: where possible, avoid impacts to listed species, critical habitat and historic properties, and consider floodplain and wetland impacts.
  • FEMA encourages coordination before work in areas with natural and cultural resources. Completed work still needs documentation to show compliance.
  • Higher-risk examples: burning debris, waterway and shoreline debris removal, mold remediation, mosquito abatement, temporary roads, levees and berms, demolition, temporary facilities, and temporary coastal work.
Documentation

Debris staging and disposal site locations and permits, any state or local conditions you followed, site remediation records for staging areas, and for completed emergency work, documentation showing compliance after the fact.

Watch out · Govstar advice
Burning debris, clearing waterways, building temporary roads or berms and demolishing structures all carry EHP risk even in an emergency. If the work is already done, you still need records showing it complied, so photograph and document staging sites before, during and after use.
PAPPG v5.0 pp. 238–239 · Stafford Act § 316
Read this in the PAPPG
Chapter 10 › I.B–C Streamlined and Complex EHP Review

Will our project get a quick EHP review or a long one?

Streamlined EHP review; complex EHP review
pp. 236–237
Short answer
It depends on the work. Like-for-like restoration, contents replacement and minor work on buildings under 45 years old usually qualify for streamlined review under existing programmatic agreements. Projects that change a facility’s size or location, touch older or historic properties, disturb soil, or are in or near floodplains, wetlands or water need longer reviews and often consultation with other agencies.
What FEMA requires
  • All projects get an EHP review; timeframes vary by project type.
  • Streamlined reviews rely on programmatic agreements and consultations with predetermined compliance decisions for repeated, similar work.
  • Projects that may affect natural and cultural resources need more information and longer review, often with consultation or coordination with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, EPA, National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, State or Tribal Historic Preservation Offices, and local, state or territorial agencies.
  • When consultation is needed, the regulatory agency sets the timeline.
  • Flood hazard area work includes the regulatory floodway and 1% annual chance floodplain, or for critical actions, the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.
<table class="pt-table"><thead><tr><th>Usually streamlined</th><th>Usually complex</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Restoring to pre-disaster condition with in-kind or like materials</td><td>New construction, or changes in location, footprint or size</td></tr><tr><td>Codes and standards upgrades</td><td>Larger or realigned roads, bridges or culverts</td></tr><tr><td>Replacing contents, supplies or equipment</td><td>Hazard mitigation and codes and standards upgrades</td></tr><tr><td>Minor work on buildings under 45 years old and not historic</td><td>Buildings or sites 45 years or older, historic landmarks, soil movement or footprint changes</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Work in or near a flood hazard area, sensitive areas, or water bodies</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Staging and disposal of debris</td></tr></tbody></table>
Documentation

For complex projects: the information above plus anything the regulatory agencies request during consultation, such as surveys, studies and permit applications.

Watch out · Govstar advice
The PAPPG lists codes and standards upgrades on both sides, so don’t assume an upgrade is quick. Anything involving a building 45 years or older, new ground disturbance or water should be planned for a longer review from the start.
PAPPG v5.0 pp. 236–237
Read this in the PAPPG
Chapter 10 › I.A.1 Required Information and Documentation

What information does FEMA need from us for the EHP review?

EHP required information and documentation
pp. 235–236
Short answer
Exact locations (address and GPS) for every work site, staging area, disturbance and fill source; the size of any ground disturbance; materials and equipment; when the facility was built and renovated; debris disposal sites; when the work happens; maps, photos and plans; and any permits or agency correspondence. Missing items lead to a request for information and delay.
What FEMA requires
  • FEMA requires information about the scope of work to support the EHP review. Providing the commonly triggered items in the table during project formulation keeps the review moving.
  • If more information is needed, FEMA issues a request for information (see Chapter 2).
  • Raise concerns and scope changes with your PA and EHP specialists early; complete and accurate information shortens the time to obligation.
<table class="pt-table"><thead><tr><th>Provide</th><th>Details</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Locations</td><td>Address and GPS for each work site, staging area, ground disturbance and fill source</td></tr><tr><td>Ground disturbance</td><td>Length, width and depth</td></tr><tr><td>Repair details</td><td>Type and quantity of materials, equipment and supplies</td></tr><tr><td>Facility history</td><td>Original construction date and later renovations</td></tr><tr><td>Staging</td><td>Equipment and materials staging information</td></tr><tr><td>Debris</td><td>Temporary and final disposal sites</td></tr><tr><td>Timing</td><td>When the work was or will be performed</td></tr><tr><td>Fill</td><td>Source of fill material</td></tr><tr><td>Visuals</td><td>Maps, photos, plans, drawings or blueprints</td></tr><tr><td>Studies</td><td>Studies and surveys, if requested</td></tr><tr><td>Permits</td><td>Permits, authorizations and correspondence with regulatory agencies</td></tr></tbody></table>
Documentation

See the table: locations and GPS for all work sites, ground disturbance dimensions, materials and equipment, construction and renovation dates, staging and debris disposal sites, work dates, fill sources, maps and photos, plans and drawings, studies, and permits and agency correspondence.

Watch out · Govstar advice
Staging areas and fill sources are the details applicants most often forget, and both can trigger historic or environmental review on their own. Record their locations at the time, not months later.
PAPPG v5.0 pp. 235–236
Read this in the PAPPG
Chapter 10 › I.A EHP Compliance Review

What is an EHP review, and does every project need one?

EHP compliance review; record of environmental consideration (REC)
pp. 234–235
Short answer
Yes. Every PA project gets an environmental and historic preservation (EHP) review to check its effects on water, air, coasts, wildlife, land, historic buildings and cultural resources, and its compliance with federal laws and executive orders. FEMA records the result in a record of environmental consideration (REC), which lists any conditions you must meet.
What FEMA requires
  • PA projects must comply with FEMA Directive 108-1 and all applicable EHP laws, regulations and executive orders, and address adverse impacts by avoiding, minimizing or compensating for them.
  • EHP specialists review your scope of work and supporting documents to understand the work, its locations (including staging areas) and what natural or cultural resources may be affected.
  • Findings go in a REC included in every project. The REC records the categorical or statutory exclusion that applies, the compliance determinations, and any project conditions.
  • For completed or partly completed work, you must document compliance with project-specific conditions, for example permits, certifications and post-construction surveys.
  • At the start of each declaration, EHP prepares a “greensheet” with EHP information for the designated areas.
  • Review timeframes vary with the scope, resources affected, public notice and consultations with regulatory agencies.
Documentation

A complete scope of work with locations (including equipment and material staging), plus the record of environmental consideration (REC) for each project and proof you met every condition it lists.

Watch out · Govstar advice
Read the conditions in each project’s REC as carefully as the scope. Unmet REC conditions, such as a missing permit or a required survey that was never done, are a common reason for costs being pulled back at closeout.
PAPPG v5.0 pp. 234–235 · FEMA Directive 108-1
Read this in the PAPPG
Govstar summarizes FEMA’s Public Assistance Program and Policy Guide, version 5.0 Amended, for disasters declared on or after January 6, 2025. “Watch out” notes are Govstar practitioner advice, not FEMA policy. Govstar is independent and not affiliated with FEMA. This is general guidance, not legal advice.