Short answer
Yes, when the incident damaged them enough to pose an immediate threat to life, public health and safety, or improved property. They are ineligible if the hazard existed before the incident, or if they are in a natural area and don’t threaten improved property or public-use areas.
<table class="pt-table"><thead><tr><th>Situation</th><th>What FEMA funds</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Tree with 50% or more of root-ball exposed</td><td>Removing the tree and root-ball and filling the hole (not two separate unit costs)</td></tr><tr><td>Tree with less than 50% of root-ball exposed</td><td>Flush cut at ground level and disposal by volume or weight; grinding the stump is ineligible</td></tr><tr><td>Stump with 50% or more of root-ball exposed</td><td>Removal and filling the hole, or in-place grinding if cheaper</td></tr><tr><td>Stump not requiring extraction</td><td>Paid by volume or weight, not per stump</td></tr></tbody></table>
- Quantity removed; quantity, location and source of fill for root-ball holes; and the equipment used.
- For each hazard, the location and photo or video of the specific immediate threat.
Source: PAPPG pp. 120–122.
Watch out · Govstar practitioner advice
Contract limbs as a one-time charge per tree, not per limb, and make sure stump prices include extraction, hauling, disposal and fill.