Short answer
Yes, through PA hazard mitigation, which funds cost-effective measures beyond codes and standards that reduce future damage to the damaged parts of a facility. It applies only to permanent work projects (Categories C–G), not emergency work.
<table class="pt-table"><thead><tr><th>A 406 measure is cost-effective if…</th><th>Basis</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Its cost is no more than 15% of the facility’s eligible repair cost (before insurance reductions)</td><td>15 percent rule</td></tr><tr><td>It is listed in PAPPG Appendix J and costs no more than 100% of the eligible repair cost</td><td>Pre-approved measures</td></tr><tr><td>A benefit-cost analysis using FEMA’s BCA Toolkit shows benefits exceed costs</td><td>Benefit-cost analysis</td></tr></tbody></table>
A hazard mitigation proposal with scope, cost, cost-effectiveness basis and environmental information.
Watch out · Govstar practitioner advice
Raise mitigation at the first site inspection. Once a project is obligated without it, adding mitigation takes far longer.