Short answer
It depends on the work. Like-for-like restoration, contents replacement and minor work on buildings under 45 years old usually qualify for streamlined review under existing programmatic agreements. Projects that change a facility’s size or location, touch older or historic properties, disturb soil, or are in or near floodplains, wetlands or water need longer reviews and often consultation with other agencies.
<table class="pt-table"><thead><tr><th>Usually streamlined</th><th>Usually complex</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Restoring to pre-disaster condition with in-kind or like materials</td><td>New construction, or changes in location, footprint or size</td></tr><tr><td>Codes and standards upgrades</td><td>Larger or realigned roads, bridges or culverts</td></tr><tr><td>Replacing contents, supplies or equipment</td><td>Hazard mitigation and codes and standards upgrades</td></tr><tr><td>Minor work on buildings under 45 years old and not historic</td><td>Buildings or sites 45 years or older, historic landmarks, soil movement or footprint changes</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Work in or near a flood hazard area, sensitive areas, or water bodies</td></tr><tr><td></td><td>Staging and disposal of debris</td></tr></tbody></table>
For complex projects: the information above plus anything the regulatory agencies request during consultation, such as surveys, studies and permit applications.
Watch out · Govstar practitioner advice
The PAPPG lists codes and standards upgrades on both sides, so don’t assume an upgrade is quick. Anything involving a building 45 years or older, new ground disturbance or water should be planned for a longer review from the start.